Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum

Dr Rowan Williams PC, DPhil, DD, FBA the 104th...
Image via Wikipedia

As an Anglican Christian and political activist, I felt compelled to comment on the attacks on Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury after his critique of the government.

I don’t think people should be shocked that Archbishop Rowan chose to speak out against a government he and many others believe is causing great harm to our nation. Certainly, Christians shouldn’t be surprised. Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of the Bible (and that should include all Christians!) should be aware that throughout both the old and new testaments, God sends his prophets to speak not just to believers, but to governments.

Isaiah goes to speak to the nations. And he speaks to those nations not just about faith, but about poverty, economy, and immigration (sound like familiar issues?) Daniel is a senior government minister, Nehemiah is a civil servant, Mordecai is a lobbyist (literally), Esther is at the heart of government, Jesus Christ disputed the right of the Roman Emperor to rule over him, and his disciples travelled the known world of the day, telling city councils about the gospel. In short, the Bible is full of politics and Christians should be comfortable being politically active. There is a long history of Christians speaking out. Christians and non-Christians talk with great respect and reverence about Wilberforce, Luther King, and Tutu. So nobody should be surprised to hear from Archbishop Rowan.

If the Chairman of the Confederation of Business and Industry, with a membership of around 240,000, – or the General Secretary of Unite with 1.5 million members – spoke out to criticise the government of the day nobody would be shocked. But when a man who is the head of a body with 80 million members does the same thing, he is decried by the right-wing media and Downing Street.

Proverbs 31:8 says that Christians should

Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,
for the rights of all who are destitute.
Speak up and judge fairly;
defend the rights of the poor and needy.

And that is exactly what Archbishop Rowan was doing. It’s also important to note that he wasn’t doing this as an individual. He didn’t just decide this on his own over a bowl of corn flakes. He spoke as the head of the Anglican Communion after listening to his Bishops, deacons and parish priests from up and down the country telling him what was happening in their communities. UK churches of all denominations have unrivalled community links with schools, daycare, immigrant groups, and the heavily indebted.

 This is why rebuttal of the Archbishop’s critique of the coalition strikes me as somewhat hypocritical.  On the one hand, David Cameron rushes to promote the idea of the ‘Big Society’, where voluntary groups are expected to sustain services being cut by the coalition government – voluntary groups of which church organisations form a significant number.  On the other hand, he dismisses the opinions of the leader of one of the biggest church organisations. If Christian groups are to be expected to help fill the gap left by state withdrawal, then Archbishop Rowan clearly has a right and a responsibility to question Government initiatives. If the Prime Minister set up a voluntary community health centre, would he expect a doctor to volunteer her time freely but not allow  her to voice an opinion on how that health centre were being run?

 The Prime Minister and his party cannot promote the idea of a cohesive, communal ‘Big Society’,  and simultaneously dismiss the views of the leader of a group which helps maintain that society as ‘plain wrong’, ‘unacceptable’ and, according to Roger Gale, ‘offensive’.  The Prime Minister cannot have his cake and eat it too.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. As a Christian myself, I agree with all your points. To a certain extent many Christian organisations (and other religions) have been delivering what is now called ‘the big society’ for many years, often in the face of organisations that will not them becavuse they are religious groups. Sadly, the fall out from the coalition policies will see what these groups now deliver ‘on top of’, it will become ‘instead of’. Where I perhaps have issues is of a man commenting on people who have at least faced election by the people and in a parliamentary democracy secured a majority in parliament, as opposed to sitting, seemingly contently in an unelected upper chamber, by right of position alone. While his comments are accurate and welcome, he has been a vocal opponent of this government and the last, I still feel that the church of England has the potential to deliver more in terms of resources and leadership than it has for a long time. My personal opinion is that at times the church has been a little scared of being a church.

  2. Wow. I’m really glad I came across this site! I actually share the same views about the big society and I have blogged about it myself, http://bugspit-politics.blogspot.com/. As a 16 year old it is becoming extremely hard to break into the world of politics so it would be really great if you could tell me what you think about my blog (I too enjoy the odd joke about Dav Cam).

    Regards,
    Sally Hussain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s